Build once. Reuse and adapt.
DPCLiK uses structured .clik files that can live in a shared General Library or a teacher’s personal library. Open a rubric to view, print, export, or adapt it.
DPCLiK is a competency-based teaching workspace for building standards-aligned rubrics, organizing them into courses, connecting each proficiency level to instructional materials, and designing next-generation assessment around real evidence of learning.
Shared and personal .clik rubric libraries with standards and proficiency data.
Use recommended course mappings or build your own and assign rubrics.
Level-specific activities, printable handouts, and hybrid delivery plans.
Evidence artifacts, feedback cadence, competency signals, and named badges.
The current DPCLiK prototype connects the pieces teachers normally manage in separate places. A rubric can carry standards, competency alignment, proficiency descriptors, performance indicators, sample evidence, instructional materials, and assessment signals — then be organized into the courses where it is taught.
DPCLiK uses structured .clik files that can live in a shared General Library or a teacher’s personal library. Open a rubric to view, print, export, or adapt it.
Start from a recommended mapping or create a course from scratch, add a description, and choose the rubrics that belong in it.
The prototype currently aligns CCSS, NGSS, and California Social Studies standards to DiplomaPlus competencies and lets educators include or exclude child standards across the rubric.
Learning is organized across Emerging, Capable, Bridging, Proficient, and Metacognitive levels, with Bloom’s levels, verbs, descriptors, indicators, and sample evidence.
Each proficiency level can include ready-to-use activities, materials, teacher notes, printable handouts, and independent/async plus classroom-day delivery plans.
Assessment signals identify the modality, competency being demonstrated, evidence artifact, feedback cadence, and named badge associated with each level.
DPCLiK’s current assessment model is designed around continuous evidence, academic content and durable competencies together, feedback students can act on, and evidence-backed competency signals.
Define evidence at checkpoints throughout a unit rather than relying only on a single end-of-unit event.
Use the same student work to represent academic knowledge and what the student can explain, analyze, evaluate, or create.
Specify peer checks, teacher conferences, self-checks, seminars, or other feedback while students still have time to improve.
Associate each proficiency level with a named badge and the evidence artifact that supports it.